Emdashes—Modern Times Between the Lines
The Basics:
About Emdashes | Email us
Ask the Librarians
Best of Emdashes: Hit Parade
A Web Comic: The Wavy Rule
Features & Columns:
Headline Shooter
On the Spot
Looked Into
Sempé Fi: Cover Art
The Hyphen Is Deceitful Above All Things
Filed under: Looked Into Tagged: Hendrik Hertzberg, politics, punctuation, TOTT
From Hendrik Hertzberg's amusing Talk of the Town about Cheney-haters and the stalwarts who love him:
Truly, this is the Bush-Cheney Administration, in alphabetical order. The hyphen looks like a coy equal sign—not the towhook it was for Clinton-Gore, Reagan-Bush, Carter-Mondale, and Nixon-Agnew, to say nothing of Hoover-Curtis and Roosevelt-Garner.
And from Slate 's review of the new FX show about "race-swapping":
If Black. White.—the title of which is annoyingly punctuated, by the way—were a drama, the network would be sending producers' notes about Bruno's lack of character development.
I'd like lots more of this sort of journalism; I could talk about hyphens and annoying punctuation all day.
Which reminds me, I've gotten some letters about the magazine's dogged allegiance to spelling certain words as though we were not in New Amsterdam but in Olde England. I've started a collection (a list, that is, not a bucket of quarters for the copy dept.'s re-brainwashing), so send them in if you see them.
comments are off
Comments
The New Yorker spells teenager this way: teen-ager. Even Jimmy Dean wouldn’t have used a hyphen.
Yes! That’s one of them, and they always baffle me. That one’s from some kind of prelapsarian Past, and not even England. Did Tina Brown bring in the spellings? Why didn’t they throw them out with her corner-office aspidistras? Or have they been there forever? Obviously this is a case for The Complete New Yorker and its observers. It’s strange, even to me, that I would complain about British and old-fashioned spellings—I have affinities for both vocabularies, but “centimetres”? Come on! I’m not alone in this view.