The Basics:
About Emdashes | Email us
Best of Emdashes: Hit Parade
A Web Comic: The Wavy Rule
Features & Columns:
Headline Shooter
On the Spot
Looked Into
Tom writes from Yokohama, Japan:
I received my copy of the issue on Saturday—they usually come on Friday; sometimes I receive my copy in Japan before my father gets his in California—and the Target ads didn't bother me at all. It is obvious that they are advertisements, and they are a lot less obtrusive than the usual motley ad mix. The Chicago Sun-Times article you link to goes overboard: The "sacred wall between editorial and advertising" can be said to have collapsed only if it turns out that The New Yorker's editors decided to alter their editorial content because Target took out all those ads. I've seen no evidence of that, and I don't see why a one-time full-issue buyout would be more likely to corrupt the editors' integrity than would repeated advertisements from car makers or whisky distillers.
And Kristin from elsewhere in cyberspace writes:
...I start a lot of sentences with "I was reading this article..." and everyone knows it was from The New Yorker, every time. I've read every issue, cover to cover, for about fifteen years, missing only a few right after Sept 11.
Anyway, I like the Target ads. I think they're kind of cool; it's artistic, it takes advertising to a whole different level. We're not going to get rid of ads, so might as well experience them in a new way. (Not unlike the ironically pretentious ad-but-not-an-ad Ketel One ads, but considerably more visually interesting.) It was fun to see what the different artists did with it. Frankly, I liked it. If there's anything weird about the ads, it's that Target doesn't seem to be the right demographic for The New Yorker. Technically speaking, as I learned from a New Yorker article some years ago, they don't even have a Target in Manhattan.
But perhaps they're right after all, if I'm any indication; I'm a huge New Yorker fan, and I, frankly, love Target. I like it that Target did something that sophisticated—the ads, the artists, The New Yorker. Funnily enough, the article—possibly a Talk of the Town item—about Target was one of the few times I thought the magazine was just off. [I'm pretty sure Kristin is referring to this 2002 Talk by Nancy Franklin about Christmas shopping at Target's temporary Chelsea Piers shop.) Struck me as a urbanite's misunderstanding of life outside the big city; they were mixing the benefits (if any) of big box stores like Sam's Club with those of, literally, Target. You don't drop money at Target because you buy in bulk—as the writer stated—but because you buy a wide variety of things there, all well designed and reasonably priced.
Update: Bright and early this morning, Kim from London adds:
Love your blog.
Re the Target ads and the Sun Times: I've never heard such a load of precious crap in all my life.
I'm moving to Chicago and looking for work as a reporter in a couple of months. None of this improves my opinion of the holier-than-thou U.S. press. Stick it up yer punter!
You can print that, if you want.