Best of Emdashes: Hit Parade
A Web Comic: The Wavy Rule
Before it moved to The New Yorker:
Ask the Librarians archive
About Emdashes | Email us
Features & Columns:
Headline Shooter
On the Spot
Looked Into
An interview with Katha Pollitt on Salon. Which reminds me: Congratulations, Katha and Steven!
Hello! We're a small band of culture writers, editors, and artists based in New York, Chicago, and Los Angeles. Emdashes, which spent its formative years as a New Yorker blog, is our collection of conversations—mostly civilized—about magazines, movies, design, punctuation, and other things that stir us.
Want to know more about the people who contribute to Emdashes, and the secret meanings behind our column titles? All about us.
We welcome tips, questions, comments, and corrections, and are always on the lookout for ardent, obsessive contributors. Click here to email us.
We host occasional book giveaways. Publishers, please email us for our postal address.
Our favorite things | Compliments and press
Looking for The New Yorker magazine? Kudos on your classy taste. Here's how to contact The New Yorker.
Dashes, some say, “are particularly useful in a sentence that is long and complex.” Emdashes—like an em dash itself—provides a thoughtful pause amid the hubbub.
Emdashes, founded in 2004, is written and drawn by Emily Gordon, Martin Schneider, Pollux, Jonathan Taylor, and Benjamin Chambers, as well as occasional guest contributors. All posts before October 2008 are by Emily Gordon.
The site was designed by House of Pretty with illustrations by Jesse R. Ewing.
Additional drawings are by Carolita Johnson and Pollux (author of our web comic, "The Wavy Rule"). The Emdashes pencil logo is by Jennifer Hadley, based on a 1943 Dorothy Gray ad.
Everything you tell or send us is off the record unless we ask for your permission to use it.
Comments
Hmm, I guess if I HAVE to call myself a feminist in order to express the fact that I support women’s rights, I will… But I’m still thinking about it. I happen to think I’m more of a humanist and would grant the same rights I support for women, to men as well (if ever needed be). Know what I mean? I think the things I support for womenkind are a logical consequence of supporting humankind. Because what’s good for humanity is good for women, and vice versa. No?The word “feminist” for me, having grown up in the and 70’s and 80’s, evokes the “battle of the sexes.” And I don’t even like to say I’m fighting a cold! I think it’s more about negociating differences, and being humane somehow.The intersting thing about feminism today, I’d like to point out, is the way it’s being conducted other countries, like Uruguay. Not at all combative, but nevertheless fierce and to be reckoned with, and really very much more humanist in its approach. It’s as if they learned from our beginnings. I’m quite proud of a particular magazine called Cotidiano Mujer, which is a very informative, steadfast, (maybe strident?) voice of feminism in Uruguay.In case anyone reads spanish, here’s the link: Cotidiano Mujer(I must disclose that one of the editors, Elena Fonseca, is a friend, but it was her magazine that impressed me before I got to know her even more impressive person.)
What’s your “congratulations” mark in regard to.
This might help!
Or even better, this.