Emdashes. The New Yorker between the lines
Best of Emdashes: Hit Parade
Weekly: Pick of the Issue
Bimonthly: Ask the Librarians
Submit a question for the next column.
Frequently:
Headline Shooter
Seal Barks
Eustace Google
Looked Into
David Remnick Demonstrates the Correct Usage of "Hopefully"
Filed under: Eds. Tagged: David Remnick, TOTT
Even the national pastime was in danger. “But,” Gore added hopefully, “I have faith in baseball commissioner George W. Bush when he says, ‘We will find the steroid users if we have to tap every phone in America!’ ”There you have it. That's how to employ "hopefully"; it means "with hope." My mother taught me to say "with any luck" when the world's bad influences whisper phrases like "Hopefully, I will win the Nobel Prize in Literature." I pass that along to you, hopefully. If anyone is getting ready to recite that the English language is always evolving, I will globally warm them.
Who we?
Emdashes, founded December 2004, is a place where keen and dedicated readers of The New Yorker, past and present, can find related news and commentary: about people, subjects, and ideas within the magazine, and events and conversations outside its pages. Learn more about us and our contributors.
We welcome tips, questions, and comments about The New Yorker past and present, plus related events, links, typeface sightings, &c. To contact the magazine or send a submission, click here.
No fear: Everything you say or send is off the record unless we ask for your permission to use it.
This site is neither owned nor operated by The New Yorker magazine or Condé Nast Publications.
A few clips
- Report: Learning to read with comic books edited by Françoise Mouly (for Print)
- Interview: Designer Eleanor Grosch (for Print)
- Review: Charles Addams: A Cartoonist's Life by Linda H. Davis (for Newsday)
- Review: The King's Gambit: A Son, a Father, and the World's Most Dangerous Game by Paul Hoffman (for Newsday)
- Review: Does The New Republic's recent redesign mean a change of tune? (for Print)
- Proposal: A more attractive MetroCard (for A Brief Message)
- Interview: James Surowiecki on what's next for the wisdom of crowds (for Assignment Zero)
- Report: Eustace Tilley spruces up for The New Yorker's website redesign (for Print)
- Feature: Muslim immigration iconography in the Netherlands (for Print)
- Review: books about various New Yorker cartoonists by Liza Donnelly and Iain Topliss (for Newsday)
- Profile: screenwriter and novelist Joe Keenan (for Newsday)
- Review: The Complete New Yorker (for Print)
Tell me more
They say that dashes “are particularly useful in a sentence that is long and complex.” Emdashes—like em dashes—emphasizes what’s between: in particular, between the lines, covers, and issues of a magazine close to my heart.
Primary sources
The New Yorker
Events listed by the magazine
Web resources: New Yorker writers and artists
Books, Organizations, &c.
Edited by Martin Schneider, designed by Pretty, and illustrated by Inkleaf. Additional drawings by Carolita Johnson. Kissable pencil girl by Jennifer Hadley, based on a 1943 Dorothy Gray ad.
The Rossosphere
- Resistance Is Fertile
- Mick Stevens: I Really Should Be Drawing
- Cartoonist Michael Maslin's homepage
- Alex Ross: The Rest Is Noise
- Sasha Frere-Jones
- Matthew Diffee's HuffPo blog
- The New Yorker Magazine in the 1930s
- The essential Jane Grant
- Paul Noth's Pale Force
- The New York Public Library records
- New Yorker Comment
- Chiasmus in The New Yorker
- Wikipedia: The New Yorker
- New Yorker database
- The New Orcer
- Silence of the City
- Between the Squibs
- Blog About Town
- Newyorkette
- New Yorker Anti-Caption Contest
- The New Yorker Forums
- I Hate the New Yorker
- Ben Yagoda's homepage
- Access My Library
- New Yorker haiku
- Modern Spectator
- Map: Caption Contest Winners
- Technorati: New Yorker
- Link to suggest? Email it!
Comments
The correct version of that sentence would of course be: “Hopefully, I will win the Nobel Prize in Literature, irregardless.”
On a tangent...it appears I am the one remaining person in the United States to understand that "critique" is a noun and not a verb. People prefer to "critique" because they think "criticizing" anything would be rude.
The latter usage has a kind of faux sophistication, although to my ear it just sounds semiliterate. (Especially given that my understanding of critique, even as a noun, comes via Kant and Marx, who use it to mean a form of analysis much more rigorous than casual evaluation.)
I realize that it is wasting my time complaining about this and that I should just continue to grind my teeth in silence.
As usual, I can't but agree with McLemee: "critique", in any realm outside of pure reason, seems to appeal because of its chintzy -ique ending, which gives it a gauze of genteel Frenchness.
As for me, I can't abide "cliché" as an adjective (to say nothing of "clichéd").
Scott—remember, criticism is only OK if it's "constructive criticism."
Yes -- but keep in mind that, as Bakunin said, the urge to destroy can be a creative urge.
Bakunin, I mean.
One day I am going to write a book about Bukharin, Bakunin, and Bakhtin. That should be good for a nervous breakdown or two.
These torpid snow primates will survive the winter hopefully. To them, the glass is always half full.
Madison, I hope you know that whether the glass is half full or half empty, some primate is going to have to wash it.
Isn't it annoying when you are criticizing the world's usage mistakes and you make one yourself? (Scott.)
I have pretty much given up, and I now accept (kind of, sort of, grudgingly) "hopefully"--though you won't hear it uttered from my lips.
But what I cannot abide is when one of my non-writer clients changes my "use" to "utilize." Because it's so much smarter-sounding to use three syllables than one, you know?