Best of Emdashes: Hit Parade
Our Daily Comic: The Wavy Rule
Archive: Ask the Librarians
Send us a question!
Frequently:
Headline Shooter
Seal Barks
Eustace Google
Looked Into
Surely I'm not the only person who thinks that "Pick of the Issue" describes not only one of Emdashes's more debate-worthy features but also the entirety of Brijit's business plan?
Don't mistake that for a dis. Brijit (keep wanting to slip a d in there) certainly looks like a competent stab at the concept, and we wish it luck. I'm for any website that pays handsomely for reading and then writing about the experience. (That sector is having a hard time.) The concept, which the site describes as "great content in 100 words or less," er, fewer (sue me, I'm an editor), reminds me of two other wonderfully terse sites, 75 or Less and A Brief Message. Brijit may be especially useful for me—an occupational hazard of mine is occasionally forgetting that there are magazines aside from The New Yorker! (Emily doesn't exactly have this problem.)
I like the elegant way the three dots in Brijit's name are spun out to the three points of the rating system. Of the hundreds of New Yorker articles rated on the site, I could only find two that garnered three dots ("exceptional, a must-read, not to be missed"), neither of which appeared as a Pick of the Issue, as it happens. We too sometimes skip the obvious praise for David Remnick or Oliver Sacks in favor of other accolades, so it's not as though we disagree. To be fair, it does seem like an awful lot of New Yorker articles get two stars, which means they're "special, worth making time for."
Here's hoping that Birjit doesn't go the way of Plastic.com. (Oh wait, Plastic still exists.) —Martin Schneider
Hello! We are media enthusiasts and culture addicts—not to mention classically trained (as we like to say) professional journalists. This is our collection of generally civilized conversations about magazines, movies, politics, punctuation, and other things that stir us.
You'd like to read more about us individually? That's so nice! Here you can learn a lot more about the Emdashes team, the mysterious-sounding names of our daily and non-daily columns, and our guest contributors.
We welcome tips, questions, and comments, and are always looking for ardent new contributors who care about letters (postal, typographical, admiring, literary, and tough-love). Here's how to contact us.
Occasionally, we host book giveaways, and review books here as often as we can. Publishers, please e-mail us and we'll send you an appropriate mailing address.
They say that dashes “are particularly useful in a sentence that is long and complex.” Emdashes—like em dashes—provides a thoughtful pause amid the hubbub.
Emdashes, founded in 2004, is currently written and drawn by Emily Gordon, Martin Schneider, Pollux, Jonathan Taylor, and Benjamin Chambers, as well as occasional guest contributors. (Unsigned posts through October 2008 are by Emily Gordon.)
The site is designed and maintained by House of Pretty and illustrated by Jesse Ewing for Inkleaf Studio. Additional drawings are by Carolita Johnson and Pollux (who also draws our daily comic, "The Wavy Rule"). The kissable Emdashes logo is by Jennifer Hadley, based on a 1943 Dorothy Gray ad.
Everything you tell or send us is off the record unless we ask for your permission to use it.
T-shirts! The Emdashes Emporium at CafePress.
Comments
In far fewer than 100 words:
Thanks for the kind words and feedback. Please keep those cards and letters coming. (And for the record, we tried really hard to live with the more colloquial "100 words or less." But of course you're right, and we'll be changing it soon.)
Best,
Jeremy Brosowsky, founder & CEO, Brijit
www.brijit.com
For what it's worth, I can see the argument that keeping it as "less" is a better business decision. It's the way people speak.
Good luck!