Best of Emdashes: Hit Parade
A Web Comic: The Wavy Rule
Before it moved to The New Yorker:
Ask the Librarians archive
About Emdashes | Email us
Features & Columns:
Headline Shooter
On the Spot
Looked Into
Martin Schneider writes:
Ben Bernanke's had a hard "time":http://emdashes.com/2008/12/an-obit-fit-to-blog-and-print.php of it "today":http://emdashes.com/2008/12/best-of-the-120108-issue-banan.php on our "site":http://emdashes.com/2008/12/the-wavy-rule-a-daily-comic-by-96.php, but you know, the Dow's lost a fifth of its value since he took over the Fed. I think he can take what Emdashes dishes out.
For me, the most stunning revelation of John Cassidy's "article":http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/12/01/081201fa_fact_cassidy?printable=true comes in the third paragraph, in which it is revealed that before the truly cataclysmic problems began in September, Bernanke and his crew had been merrily pursuing what they "referred to as the 'finger-in-the-dike' strategy."
The mind reels. Now, Bernanke has been criticized for seeing too little danger on the horizon, and judging from Cassidy's fine article, that criticism is merited. But shouldn't _his own choice of metaphor_ have been a powerful signal _to him_ that he might be assessing the potential for crisis too lightly?
Even if the actual folk tale of the Little Dutch Boy has a "happy ending":http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_Brinker_or_the_Silver_Skates#Popular_culture:_the_legend_of_the_boy_and_the_dike, isn't the image that the phrase evokes one of a crisis that mounts steadily, beyond the ability of even an infinite number of fingers to plug the bewildering profusion of holes? Isn't the lesson that some problems demand _much more_ than a Little Dutch Boy?
That blind spot tells us much about the perils of ideological rigidity in an ideological time; if you believe that the market is self-correcting and that governmental intervention is pernicious, then you are liable to see even Armageddon Itself as a matter best handled by a few judicious tweaks to the interest rate. Bernanke's not an ideological firebrand; yet even he believed these things. That's telling.
Simply put: If Plan A is an overt advertisement that you intend to let the problem overwhelm your intentionally meager efforts, isn't that a strong indication that you should start looking pretty carefully at Plan B?
It makes me think of John McCain. He never referred to the Sarah Palin pick, or anything else, as a "Hail Mary," you know. That was a characterization made by observers. If he had done so, it would have been tantamount to conceding defeat; isn't that exactly what Bernanke did? How is this not economic malpractice? Am I making too much of this?
Hello! We're a small band of media enthusiasts, culture addicts, and journalists based in New York, Chicago, and Los Angeles. Emdashes, formerly a New Yorker fan site, is our collection of conversations—mostly civilized—about magazines, movies, politics, design, punctuation, and other things that stir us.
You'd like to know more about the writers and artists and what our column titles mean? We live to serve!
We welcome tips, questions, comments, and corrections, and are always on the lookout for ardent, obsessive new contributors. Click here to email us.
We host occasional book giveaways. Publishers, please email us for our postal address.
Dashes, some say, “are particularly useful in a sentence that is long and complex.” Emdashes—like an em dash itself—provides a thoughtful pause amid the hubbub.
Emdashes, founded in 2004, is written and drawn by Emily Gordon, Martin Schneider, Pollux, Jonathan Taylor, and Benjamin Chambers, as well as occasional guest contributors. All posts before October 2008 are by Emily Gordon.
The site was designed by House of Pretty with illustrations by Jesse R. Ewing.
Additional drawings are by Carolita Johnson and Pollux (author of our web comic, "The Wavy Rule"). The Emdashes pencil logo is by Jennifer Hadley, based on a 1943 Dorothy Gray ad.
Everything you tell or send us is off the record unless we ask for your permission to use it.
Comments
Good points! The use of that metaphor is telling. I remember reading a version of the tale of the dike-plugging “Hero of Haarlem” in which the boy actually freezes to death but now I don’t remember where I saw it. In any case, the Little Dutch Boy wouldn’t have had to do what he did if the dike had been built well in the first place. An amusing picture here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Hans_Brinker_Madurodam.jpg
Great post, Martin. And I love the new “Squib Report” graphic!
Yeah, isn’t it swell? By Paul! We now have three artists doing category images, and they all complement each other perfectly, I think.