Emdashes—Modern Times Between the Lines

The Basics:
About Emdashes | Email us

Before it moved to The New Yorker:
Ask the Librarians

Best of Emdashes: Hit Parade
A Web Comic: The Wavy Rule

 
January052009

Random Profiler: Winthrop Sargeant on Glynn Ross, 1978

Filed under: The Squib Report   Tagged: , , , ,

In this installment (see this post for an introduction to the series), the roulette wheel landed on Winthrop Sargeant’s 1978 Profile on Glynn Ross. This was very much the sort of Profile that I was hoping for when I started this project: an interesting subject previously unknown to me.

Ross was the director of the Seattle Opera starting in the 1960s, and he did a lot to popularize the form in the northwestern metropolis by using unconventional promotional techniques and generally being smart about his task. It was his policy to perform all operas in the original language and in English, an idea that shouldn’t be as rare as it apparently is. He was also very shrewd about attracting established stars to remote and (then) unfashionable Washington State for single productions. On this, Sargeant quotes Ross: “An artist wants four things: one, a chance to do something that requires the best of his abilities; two, the opportunity to grow by singing different roles; three, prestige; and four, a paycheck.”

Ross staged the first American production of Wagner’s Ring Cycle that didn’t take place at New York’s Metropolitan Opera, a production that helped establish Seattle as a major center of Wagner interest. He used colorful slogans directed at the new wave of youthful customers, such as “La Bohème: Six old-time hippies in Paris,” “Roméo et Juliette: Two kids in trouble, real trouble, with their families,” and (cue bad-pun grimace) “Get Ahead with Salome.” In 1971, just a couple years after it was written, the Seattle Opera was the first reputable opera house to stage The Who’s Tommy, with Bette Midler in a leading role, a detail the magazine omits. (In a perfect world, we’d have some YouTube footage of that production!) In baseball, the analogous figure would be Bill Veeck, roughly.

Sargeant’s work here is a reminder of how conservative the form can sometimes be, which is not a criticism. The Profile starts by establishing the subject’s Profile-worthiness and then segues to the subject’s background, relying a good deal on lengthy quotation from the subject. It’s not “exciting,” but it does the job.

Reading the Profile, it’s difficult not to think of Peter Gelb, general manager of the Met since 2006 and a New Yorker Conference attendee in 2008. Gelb has been phenomenally successful in finding new audiences for Met productions, and his main weapons have been the appearance of filmed versions of current productions in our nation’s multiplexes and fresh thinking on the nature of those productions, both in their selection and in the emphasis on accessability. A quick search at Google suggests that not too many people have suggested the parallels between Ross and Gelb, but they seem pretty obvious to me (not that I’d be aware of any other similar figures).

Comments

Martin, I’m enjoying this series very much. I’m an archivist and cataloger working for the University of Washington Libraries. We’re in the process of trying to fine-tune a blog for Special Collections before it goes public and I’m always on the lookout for blog posts relating to the history of the performing arts in Seattle and the Pacific Northwest. It’s interesting that Winthrop Sargeant took notice of Ross and Seattle Opera as early as 1978. I’m just curious why you didn’t include either name as tags to your post; aren’t they as much the subjects of your piece as Bette Midler or Peter Gelb? Sorry, it’s the cataloger in me. I can’t help myself!

Helice KofflerJanuary 05, 2009

Thanks for the kind words, Helice! As to your question, I find myself divided between the responses “You’re right, that was pretty silly” and “Ah, but it makes sense for us.” It’s a little of both!

Well, let’s explain the thinking, at least. In principle, the function of the tags is to create a large number (hundreds) of ad-hoc categories so that the user can see all 8 posts having to do with Louis Menand, say, on a single page. Seen that way, a Principle of Likely Repetition emerges; if a person is likely to be mentioned one solitary time, then perhaps that person does not warrant a tag (we also have some small incentive to keep the tags manageable).

There’s a second principle, of New Yorker Relevance, to keep in mind. All New Yorker contributors get a tag. As for the others, Gelb was mentioned in another post, which I happen to know since I wrote that other post, so we know that the first principle has been met; and Midler is famous. Alas, Glynn Ross is not terribly likely to be a recurring subject. On an opera history blog, the calculations would run otherwise. But perhaps we will find a way!

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, it may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Thanks for waiting.)

2008 Webby Awards Official Honoree