Monthly Archives: February 2005

(2.07.05 issue) Hobophobes

In the text to the great new Complete Cartoons, the editors write:

In 1929, the trading floor of the New York Stock Exchange was just a few subway stops away from The New Yorker‘s midtown offices, but when, in October, the crash came the magazine did its very best to ignore it…. Cartoonists were, on the whole, less interested in the contrasts between rich and poor than in the way the rich reacted to the crisis…

All right, then: Mistakes were made. After all, “I never told her about the Depression. She would have worried” is much funnier than grim union graphics. But is there really any call to keep printing cartoons like this week’s P.C. bum? When you live in the actual city of New York or similar urban places, actual bums are a pitiful sight, and the number of schticksters with signs and quick comebacks is pretty tiny compared with the legions of people so inert they might be dead, under cardboard. It’s been a while since I found these cartoons funny, I’m afraid.

On the other hand, the anthology is just about the best treat I’ve had in years (thanks, Dad!). It’s so big you feel small, like Alice, reading a book that will never end. It almost can’t, what with the two enclosed CDs that bring the cartoon total up to 68,647. Yum.

The Complete Cartoons of The New Yorker, ed. Robert Mankoff [Powell’s]

Swim at home!

If I’m not mistaken, this weekly rant about the New Yorker’s ads hasn’t been updated in ages. Come back, R. Callahan, and show us more of your sufferings! The only ad I’ll defend to the death is “Are you missing a piece of your pattern?” For sheer sadness, that phantom fork is up there with Hemingway’s “For sale: baby shoes. Never used.”


The New Yorker Inane Ad of the Week

Categories: ,

Fellow Traveler

On the F train from Brooklyn, a tall man in calf-length green and purple patterned wool coat, dark grey wool pants with a thin purple stripe, checked shirt, grey tweed cap, well-shined black shoes, and iPod, managing to be natty and flamboyant at once without being obnoxious about it. Reading the Philip Johnson obit, natch.
Incidentally, the Talk of the Town and In the Magazine pages on CondéNet could be better coordinated; not all the links work, and they don’t quite match in either style or description (also, the issue date is wrong on the former). [Note from the future: Needless to say, this is no longer true.]

(2.07.05 issue) Benchley McGrath

Like many people, I tend to suspect the prolific, mostly because I tend to not be. But almost everything Ben McGrath writes for Talk of the Town is like a Mrs. Prindable apple: juicy, sweet, modestly extravagant, and just tart and nutty enough to satisfy. His TOT (if anyone knows the in-house abbreviation, please send–it might just be “Talk”) this week about rebuilding the A/C line is full of sound information just until it isn’t, when it becomes an investigation into the ethereal–my kind of Talk of the Town. Robert Benchley pieces have just this kind of daffy, utterly confident meandering. Seven hundred words or so is a good platform for a serious editorial, sure, and it’s hard not to love terse, sword-point portraits of Cracker Jack prize experts or very small controversies. But this is my favorite: McGrath’s expansiveness within the form, like a hippo blues dancing in a wading pool.


Dept. of Prediction: Three to Five [New Yorker]

Categories: , , ,