Martin Schneider writes:
This found its way into my in-box:
Jane Mayer in Conversation with Frank Rich at the 92nd Street Y
Tuesday, May 19, 8 pm
Join Jane Mayer, New Yorker staff writer and author of the best-selling book The Dark Side: The Inside Story of How the War on Terror Turned Into a War on American Ideals, and Frank Rich, New York Times Op-Ed columnist and author of Ghost Light: A Memoir, for a lively discussion on Mayer’s book, current events and issues of national security, civil liberties and American ideals.
New Yorker readers save 20% on the listed ticket price with the discount code FR20. Click www.92Y.org/Mayer, call 212.415.5500 or visit the 92nd Street Y Box Office, at Lexington Avenue at 92nd Street.
Emily, Jonathan, and I will be attending, so if you see us, by all means say hello!
Author Archives: Emdashes
The Wavy Rule, a Daily Comic by Pollux: The Innovators (#2)
![]()
A mini-series in honor of the “Innovators Issue”:http://www.newyorker.com/services/presscenter/2009/05/11/090511pr_press_releases of _The New Yorker_ (May 11, 2009). Click on the cartoon to enlarge it!
Read “The Wavy Rule” archive, and “order your Wavy Rule 2008 Anthology today!”:http://emdashes.com/2009/03/the-wavy-rule-anthology-now-fo.php
Supreme Court Design Rules: Certiorari in Century, Please
Jonathan Taylor writes:
While we’re all talking about the Supreme Court: Anyone who has consulted an order or opinion on the Supreme Court’s site will know its attachment to the PDF, unsurprising given the format’s imperviousness to the vagaries of software. The staid, rather than stately, Century Schoolbook pages caged in one’s screen recall the defiance of David Souter amid the bells and whistles of Washington:
![]()
Turns out the court has some pretty stringent views on typography, and on the crafty task of assembling petitions, briefs and replies into little “booklets” for the justices to curl up with. From the Rules of the Court (PDF, natch, or HTML here):
Rule 33. Document Preparation: Booklet Format; 8½- by 11-Inch Paper Format
1. Booklet Format:
(a) Except for a document expressly permitted by these Rules to be submitted on 8½- by 11-inch paper, see, e. g., Rules 21, 22, and 39, every document filed with the Court shall be prepared using using a standard typesetting process (e. g., hot metal, photocomposition, or computer typesetting) to produce text printed in typographic (as opposed to typewriter) characters. The process used must produce a clear, black image on white paper. The text must be reproduced with a clarity that equals or exceeds the output of a laser printer.
(b) The text of every booklet-format document, including any appendix thereto, shall be typeset in Century family (e.g., Century Expanded, New Century Schoolbook, or Century Schoolbook) 12-point type with 2-point or more leading between lines. Quotations in excess of 50 words shall be indented. The typeface of footnotes shall be 10-point or larger with 2-point or more leading between lines. The text of the document must appear on both sides of the page.
(c) Every booklet-format document shall be produced on paper that is opaque, unglazed, 6 1/8 by 9 1/4 inches in size, and not less than 60 pounds in weight, and shall have margins of at least three fourths of an inch on all sides. The text field, including footnotes, should be approximately 4 1/8 by 7 1/8 inches. The document shall be bound firmly in at least two places along the left margin (saddle stitch or perfect binding preferred) so as to permit easy opening, and no part of the text should be obscured by the binding. Spiral, plastic, metal, and string bindings may not be used. Copies of patent documents, except opinions, may be duplicated in such size as is necessary in a separate appendix.
What’s more, there’s color-coded scheme for all those different types of supplications: your ordinary Petition for an Extraordinary Writ goes under a white cover, but a Brief for an Amicus Curiae in Support of the Defendant, Respondent, or Appellee, on the Merits or in an Original Action at the Exceptions Stage has got to be “dark green.” If you’re not sure what “light red” is, or you want to make sure your unglazed “tan” chapbook fairly screams “Brief Opposing a Motion to Dismiss or Affirm,” well, “The Clerk will furnish a color chart upon request”:
![]()
But note, it’s up to Counsel to “ensure that there is adequate contrast between the printing and the color of the cover.”
(In contrast, I’m a little surprised that, when it comes to adhering to word-count limits, “The person preparing the certificate may rely on the word count of the word-processing system used to prepare the document.” I wouldn’t want to test Clarence Thomas’s generosity with that rule.)
Via the promising site Typography for Lawyers, Ruth Anne Robbins, author of the manual (keep that Adobe Reader open) “Painting with Print,” suggests that the high court’s strictures might be necessary in light of lawyers’ slovenly word-processing habits. From the Journal of the Association of Legal Writing Directors, it’s a passionately footnoted plea for visually illiterate attorneys to wake up and smell the hot metal.
Irvin on a See-Saw: Two Rea Irvin Magazine Covers
Everybody loves “Rea Irvin”:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rea_Irvin. It’s true. “Liza Cowan”:http://www.lizacowan.com/, lucky enough to own two original Rea Irvin magazine covers at her shop, writes about Irvin at “her blog”:http://seesaw.typepad.com/blog/2009/05/rea-irvin.html. And if you haven’t read it yet, “Emily’s article on Irvin”:http://www.printmag.com/Article.aspx?ArticleSlug=Everybody_Loves_Rea_Irvin is required reading for anyone interested in Irvinian Studies. You can minor in it here at Emdashes.
The Wavy Rule, a Daily Comic by Pollux: The Innovators (#1)
![]()
A mini-series in honor of the “Innovators Issue”:http://www.newyorker.com/services/presscenter/2009/05/11/090511pr_press_releases of _The New Yorker_ (May 11, 2009). Click on the cartoon to enlarge it!
Read “The Wavy Rule” archive.
“Order your Wavy Rule 2008 Anthology today!”:http://emdashes.com/2009/03/the-wavy-rule-anthology-now-fo.php
New Museum 90s Panel: Roseanne Profile as Decade’s Time Capsule
Jonathan Taylor writes:
Friday night’s “The 90s vs. The 90s” panel discussion was occupied for a long time on what, either at the time or in retrospect, was “dark” or “light” about the decade, in the words of the moderator, n+1‘s Mark Greif.
The purest vein of nostalgia for the 90s was expressed by Aaron Lake Smith, 25. To him, the “public conversation was more interesting,” because, in its weird way, it was addressing “the roots of capitalism”—why did Columbine happen; Ross Perot and the “giant sucking sound”; the Zapatistas—as opposed to the sham of, say, today’s torture “debate.” Scott Hamrah—once of Suck.com, a URL worth a thousand Q&A’s—was quick to knock down young Aaron’s rosy version, countering that the “conversation” was about O.J., not Subcomandante Marcos.
At a certain point, Marisa Meltzer suggested that the middle period of the 90s was a high point of sorts for the well-being of women, on an arc described between the Anita Hill testimony (1991) and the Lewinsky affair (1998, although Meltzer zeroed in on that year’s premiere of “Sex and the City” as the decade’s Altamont). As evidence of the good times, she cited the 1995 New Yorker profile of Roseanne Barr—”it’s like something beamed to you from some era you never lived through and never will again” she said, or something close thereto.
Quite so. The article is likely overshadowed in many memories by the foofaraw over Roseanne’s consulting-editorship of the 1996 “Women’s Issue.” But after all the talk about authenticity and shallowness, John Lahr’s profile of Roseanne, who might be the closest thing to America’s Bertolt Brecht, is a heartening reminder of the substance that can be created by spectacle.
Sempé Fi (On Covers): Jet-Packing Through the Gates of Horn and Ivory
![]()
_Pollux writes_:
He wasn’t easily distracted. Occasionally a pigeon would flutter by; he wouldn’t look up. Sometimes his iPod malfunctioned and played the same song twice; he wouldn’t notice. You could hear Keane’s “She Has No Time” a million times anyway and never get sick of it.
But today was different. All was quiet and normal, and then suddenly he heard something that sounded like a cross between a backfiring ’58 Biscayne and a beer siphoning a homebrew. A sound like _PutTUTtatatataGLOOglooglooputputTUT_.
An old man was flying.
This old man didn’t mean to fly by the office of one of the city’s up-and-coming car designers (let’s call him Stephen), who is considered a true innovator by his peers and by Stephen’s new wife (he got married last month).
It was a good test run for the old man, and he didn’t end up falling out of the sky like a liver-spotted Icarus and dashing his brains on the corner of Broadway and Eighth.
The old man (let’s call him Buster) never went to college. This is the story of his life: he lied about his age in order to join the Navy, saw the world (mostly the Pacific) and saw some action on a swift-boat penetrating the Giang Thanh-Vinh Te canal system in North ‘Nam. He married his high school sweetheart and then lost her to cancer. He’s worked as a machinist, junkyard watchman, ticket collector on the railway, and sign-painter. He’s worked in a dead letter office, plastic packaging plant, textiles factory, and pet store. Buster has suffered from chemical burns on both hands, and currently suffers from high blood pressure, osteoporosis, and urinary incontinence. He remembers the friends he lost on the Giang Thanh-Vinh Te canal system. The only time he’s happy is when he’s tinkering around in his garage. Buster always wanted to fly, so he decided to build a jetpack.
If he had any friends, they’d laugh at him.
On the other hand, Stephen, our up-and-coming car designer, has plenty of friends. They envy his life and drink his expensive wine over a spirited game of Cranium. Stephen was a precocious child, and designed cool-looking soap-box racers when all of the other kids were duck-hunting with their Nintendoes. His excellent portfolio got him accepted to the Art Center College of Design in Pasadena, where he learned 3-D modeling and where to get the best marijuana (Venice Beach) and the best Retro Nerd Square Glasses (again, Venice Beach). He won the prestigious EcoAuto Concept Award in 1998 and shook hands with the then-CEO of General Motors, John F. Smith, Jr.
Adhering to the “theory and practice” approach to learning, Stephen met with practicing designers, engineers, and anyone remotely connected with the auto industry. He did a summer internship at the UmeÃ¥ Institute of Design, in Sweden, and after his time at Pasadena, did a two-year automotive stylistics program at the Istituto di Scienze dell’Automobile, in Modena, Italy. Modena was the source of much of the wall decorations that brighten up Stephen’s spacious New York apartment. It was a cinch for him to find a job in a car design firm in the Big Apple in a time when the economy had not yet sunk like a power boat with badly made deck-to-hull joints. Stephen had done everything right.
Such is the dichotomy presented on “Dan Clowes'”:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Clowes cover for the May 11, 2009 issue of _The New Yorker_, called “Leading the Way.” The May 11, 2009 issue is the Innovators Issue, and Clowes is an innovator in his own right, having created works that transcend the appellation of “comics” and are instead works of literature that happen to be fully illustrated, the best known perhaps being “_Ghost World_.”:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghost_world
Clowes’ artistic style is not necessarily photo-realistic but always appears as if his subjects have been drawn from life, penciled on a subway and then inked carefully at home. You feel as if Clowes has seen a young man like Stephen somewhere, as well as an old man like Buster, perhaps not necessarily flying on a jet-pack. The _New Yorker_ cover coincides with the announcement of a new book by Clowes, as yet unnamed, that concerns, as stated in “this interview”:http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/books/2009/05/sneak-peek-dan-clowes.html, “a guy whose father dies, and he’s completely alone, so he tries to reconstruct what he’s lost, to approximate a nuclear family by joining people together.”
Clowes’ jet-packing senior also seems like someone who is completely alone, who has built his dream out of spare mechanical parts and perhaps an old fishbowl. Clowes has drawn outsider innovators before. His “May 12, 2008 cover”:http://www.cartoonbank.com/product_details.asp?mscssid=N75BLQT1QCKS9NR183NUWJWU397MBJ28&sitetype=1&did=5&sid=125205&pid=&keyword=Dan+Clowes§ion=all&title=undefined&whichpage=1&sortBy=popular depicted a two-page act of creation. An inventor builds himself a powerful robot just so that he sit down to a good game of cards. In the same way, Clowes’ jet-packing senior just wants to fly. He’s not trying to revolutionize the airline industry.
And then there’s the young, hip car designer: all this education and experience under his belt, and Stephen has ended up designing a fairly conventional-looking car.
Who remains deskbound, boring, and conventional? Stephen.
But who flies as free as a bird? Buster.
Sometimes the old, and the old-school, lead the way.
The Wavy Rule, a Daily Comic by Pollux: Everything is Illuminati
![]()
Click on the cartoon to enlarge it!
Read “The Wavy Rule” archive.
“Order your Wavy Rule 2008 Anthology today!”:http://emdashes.com/2009/03/the-wavy-rule-anthology-now-fo.php
Recent New Yorker Fiction Roundup
Benjamin Chambers writes:
I’ve been catching up on recent New Yorker stories, so I thought I’d provide a quick-ish summary of them, using a model I ripped off from Martin. [Warning: there are spoilers below.]
“The Slows,” by Gail Hareven (trans. Yaacov Jeffrey Green), May 4, 2009
Plot: An anthropologist has one last encounter with one of the “savages” he has studied for years, though he finds her kind repellent. The “savages,” like the anthropologist, are human, but they have refused a technique that greatly speeds human growth and development, setting them apart.
Key Quote:
No doubt the savages were a riddle that science had not yet managed to solve, and, the way things seemed now, it never would be solved. According to the laws of nature, every species should seek to multiply and expand, but for some reason this one appeared to aspire to wipe itself out. Actually, not only itself but also the whole human race. Slowness was an ideology, but not only an ideology. As strange as it sounds, it was a culture, a culture similar to that of our forefathers.
Verdict: You’ll like it if you don’t mind reductive parables disguised as fiction: humans invariably find reasons to justify their appetite for genocide.
“Vast Hell,” by Guillermo Martínez (trans. Alberto Manguel), April 27, 2009
Plot: A mysterious stranger arrives in a small (Argentinian?) town and is presumed to be having an affair with the wife of a barber. When the wife and stranger disappear, village gossips presume foul play. Efforts to find their bodies, however, unearth an unexpected tragedy.
Teaser Quote:
The horror made me wander from one place to another; I wasn’t able to think, I wasn’t able to understand, until I saw a back riddled with bullets and, farther away, a blindfolded head. Then I realized what it was. I looked at the inspector and saw that he, too, had understood, and he ordered us to stay where we were, not to move, and went back into town to get instructions.
Verdict: Absorbing, economical, but too abrupt. The implications of the surprise discovery at the end need more time to unfold, to become something more than an unpleasant event that touches no one.
Interesting Fact:Judging from Wikipedia’s entry on Martínez, this story is taken from a collection he published way back in 1989. (It’s his first to appear in TNY, as is Hareven’s piece.)
“A Tiny Feast,” by Chris Adrian, April 20, 2009
Plot: The changeling boy stolen by the fairies Oberon and Titania develops leukemia; uncomprehending, they must shepherd him through the horror of chemotherapy.
Key Quote:
Alice cocked her head. She did not hear exactly what Titania was saying. Everything was filtered through the same normalizing glamour that hid the light in Titania’s face, that gave her splendid gown the appearance of a tracksuit, that had made the boy appear clothed when they brought him in, when in fact he had been as naked as the day he was born. The same spell made it appear that he had a name, though his parents had only ever called him Boy, never having learned his mortal name, because he was the only boy under the hill. The same spell sustained the impression that Titania worked as a hairdresser, and that Oberon owned an organic orchard, and that their names were Trudy and Bob.
Verdict: Delightful though sad; a bit reminiscent of Sylvia Townsend Warner’s “Elphenor and Weasel.” The story only falters in its final paragraph, where the fairies are at a loss and the final lines seem insufficient to bring the piece to a close. [UPDATE: I see I didn’t make it clear that “Tiny Feast” is really an amazing story, and definitely worth reading.]
Interesting Facts:Adrian is a graduate of Iowa Writers’ Workshop, works as an emergency room pediatrician in Boston, and is this year supposed to get a degree from Harvard Divinity School. The man’s an overachiever; we’re lucky he’s a writer. I can’t wait to read the other three stories of his that have appeared in TNY.
The Wavy Rule, a Daily Comic by Pollux: The Future of Kindling
![]()
Click on the cartoon to enlarge it!
Read “The Wavy Rule” archive.
“Order your Wavy Rule 2008 Anthology today!”:http://emdashes.com/2009/03/the-wavy-rule-anthology-now-fo.php
