Author Archives: Emdashes

The “Best American” Essays in The New Yorker, 1985 to the Present

I was happy to see Emily’s statement of allegiance to The New Yorker at The Millions the other day. For that matter, I was heartened to C. Max Magee launch such an impassioned argument in favor of the magazine. While I fully agree with him, it’s occurred to me before that there are more objective measures of the quality of The New Yorker. Two years ago now, I tried to summon a collection of like-minded readers around the project of isolating the finest treasures in The Complete New Yorker. Later, I realized that that group had already coalesced here at Emdashes; what’s more, others had already done much of the work of isolating the best work that has appeared in the magazine.
You’re familiar with Houghton Mifflin’s annual “Best American” anthology series. Not too long ago, there was only The Best American Essays and The Best American Short Stories. Today, the series have proliferated, in more ways than one. Houghton Mifflin has branched out into The Best American Mystery Stories, The Best American Sports Writing, The Best American Nonrequired Reading, The Best American Comics, and so on. Meanwhile, other presses, noticing the popularity of the line, have followed suit: Da Capo now has a Best Music Writing series, Harper Perennial has its own Best American Science Writing series (Houghton Mifflin’s counterpart is called The Best American Science and Nature Writing), and so on. It’s become a crowded field.
As a rule, each series has a general editor, and every year a prominent practitioner of the art is asked to serve as guest editor. In each Best American Essays (or whatever), approximately a score of exemplars is selected to be reprinted, along with—important for my purposes—several dozen also-rans listed in the back of the book.
It will come as no surprise to anyone who has leafed through these books that The New Yorker regularly dominates them. It is the rare table of contents that does not feature an artifact from The New Yorker, more commonly two or three. The also-rans in the back also invariably feature a handful of additional gems that originally appeared in The New Yorker.
I would never claim that these selections are the final word on the subject. Surely The New Yorker and other outlets benefit from familiarity, and surely reasons that are not purely quality-based might account for this or that article or story being selected over another. Sometimes the selections seem more notable for their ability to get people talking than strict level of achievement. The guest editors are idiosyncratic; nobody’s perfect.
Nevertheless, in the aggregate the baseline quality represented in a listing of all of The New Yorker‘s selected essays or stories is simply very high. No matter how you cut it, these books are a tremendous resource for anyone seeking the best writing from the magazine over the last two decades or so.
And every last one of them is in The Complete New Yorker.
For that reason, I have sought to provide a list of the pieces from The New Yorker that have been deemed worthy of inclusion over the years. There are many; the length of the list is itself a proof of the claim that The New Yorker is superlative.
As of now, there are gaps. Anyone with a yen to trudge off to the library and jot down some authors and titles (dates I can get on my own) and then e-mail them to martin@emdashes.com is incredibly welcome to do so. I promise to add the entries to this post with alacrity, with credit. (Note that the items in this list dated, say, 2001 appeared in the collection with the year 2002 printed on the cover.) The essays are listed chronologically, so the merest glance will reveal the years I have not yet been able to secure. Please report the inevitable errors to the same address. Outright selections and also-rans are listed without noting which is which—they’re all gonna be good, right? [Update: I’ve changed my mind on this; selected essays, where available, are set in italics. —MCS]
The list can fulfill multiple purposes, of course; if you are worried about missing gems in general, this list will help you catch up. But even if you want to indulge your skeptical side and test whether that overhyped John Updike or Cynthia Ozick is really any good; well, here are the certified hits. They might not be the most exceptional works that Updike or Ozick ever wrote, but somebody clearly thought they were pretty good. I swoon at the very thought of the reading lists (a handy feature of the CNY) this post may inspire. Calvin Trillin, Adam Gopnik, Alice Munro, Roger Angell—you could generate a short reading list for each of them, and many more.
I sincerely hope readers find this list useful. More are on the way. —Martin Schneider
“Best American Essays” originating in The New Yorker:
1985 (Elizabeth Hardwick, editor)
Calvin Trillin, “Right-of-Way,” 5/6/1985
John Updike, “At War with My Skin,” 9/2/1985
Ian Frazier, “Bear News,” 9/9/1985
Joseph Brodsky, “Flight from Byzantium,” 10/28/1985
1986 (Gay Talese, editor)
Calvin Trillin, “Rumors Around Town,” 1/6/1986
Adam Gopnik, “Quattrocento Baseball,” 5/19/1986
Anthony Bailey, “A Good Little Vessel,” 6/2/1986
Vicki Hearne, “Questions about Language,” 8/18/1985
Berton Roueche, “Marble Stories,” 10/27/1986
William Pfaff, “The Dimensions of Terror,” 11/10/1986
Calvin Trillin, “The Life and Times of Joe Bob Briggs, So Far,” 12/22/1986
1987 (Annie Dillard, editor)
E.J. Kahn Jr., “The Honorable Member for Houghton” 4/20/1987
Harold Brodkey, “Reflections: Family.” 11/23/1987
Susan Sontag, “Pilgrimage,” 12/21/1987
1988 (Geoffrey Wolff, editor)
Veronica Geng, “A Lot in Common,” 1/25/1988
Calvin Trillin, “Stranger in Town,” 2/1/1988
E.J. Kahn Jr., “Hand to Hand,” 2/8/1988
George W.S. Trow Jr., “Subway Story,” 2/22/1988
Dan Hofstadter, “Omnivores, 4/25/1988
Gwen Kinkead, “An Overgrown Jack,” 7/18/1988
Robert Shaplen, “The Long River,” 8/8/1988
Joan Didion, “Letter from Los Angeles,” 9/5/1988
Berton Rouech�, “The Foulest and Nastiest Creatures that Be,” 9/12/1988
Jane Kramer, “Letter from Europe: West Berlin,” 11/28/1988
1989 (Justin Kaplan, editor)
Frances FitzGerald, “Memoirs of the Reagan Era,” 1/16/1989
Robert Heilbroner, “The Triumph of Capitalism,” 1/23/1989
Calvin Trillin, “Abigail y Yo,” 6/26/1989
Roger Angell, “No, But I Saw the Game,” 7/31/1989
Sue Hubbell, “The Vicksburg Ghost,” 9/25/1989
Cynthia Ozick, “T.S. Eliot at 101,” 11/20/1989
1990 (Joyce Carol Oates, editor)
Joan Didion, “Letter from Los Angeles,” 2/26/1990
John McPhee, “Travels of the Rock,” 2/26/1990
Michael J. Arlen, “Invisible People,” 4/16/1990
Ian Frazier, “Canal Street,” 4/30/1990
Terrence Rafferty, “The Essence of Landscape,” 6/25/1990
George W. S. Trow, “Devastation,” 10/22/1990
Calvin Trillin, “The Italian Thing,” 11/19/1990
1991 (Susan Sontag, editor)
Jane Kramer, “Letter from Europe,” 1/14/1991
Muriel Spark, “The School of the Links,” 3/25/1991
Roger Angell, “Homeric Tales,” 5/27/1991
Susan Orlean, “Living Large,” 6/17/1991
George W. S. Trow, “Needs,” 10/14/1991
Adam Gopnik, “Audubon’s Passion,” 12/25/1991
1992 (Joseph Epstein, editor)
Roger Angell, “Early Innings,” 2/24/1992
Alastair Reid, “Waiting for Columbus,” 2/24/1992
Oliver Sacks, “A Surgeon’s Life,” 3/16/1992
Cynthia Ozick, “Alfred Chester’s Wig,” 3/30/1992
David Owen, “One-Ring Mud Show,” 4/20/1992
David Rieff, “Original Virtue, Original Sin,” 11/23/1992
1993 (Tracy Kidder, editor)
Calvin Trillin, “The First Family of Astoria,” 2/8/1993
A. Alvarez, “The Dark at the Top of the Stairs,” 3/8/1993
Jamaica Kincaid, “Alien Soil,” 6/21/1993
Harold Brodkey, “To My Readers,” 6/21/1993
John McPhee, “Duty of Care,” 6/28/1993
Edward Conlon, “To the Potter’s Field,” 7/19/1993
Joan Didion, “Trouble in Lakewood,” 7/26/1993
Adam Gopnik, “Death in Venice,” 8/2/1993
Ted Conover, “Trucking Through the AIDS Belt,” 8/16/1993
David Denby, “Does Homer Have Legs?” 9/6/1993
Ian Frazier, “The Frankest Interview Yet,” 9/27/1993
Alec Wilkinson, “The Confession,” 10/4/1993
F. Gonzalez-Crussi, “Days of the Dead,” 11/1/1993
Cynthia Ozick, “Rushdie in the Louvre,” 12/13/1993
John McPhee, “Irons in the Fire,” 12/20/1993
Linda H. Davis, “The Man on the Swing,” 12/27/1993
1994 (Jamaica Kincaid, editor)
Harold Brodkey, “Dying: An Update,” 2/7/1994
Alfred Kazin, “Jews,” 3/7/1994
Louis Menand, “The War of All Against All,” 3/14/1994
Henry Louis Gates, Jr., “In the Kitchen,” 4/18/1994
John Edgar Wideman, “Father Stories,” 8/1/1994
David Denby, “Queen Lear,” 10/3/1994
Jamaica Kincaid, “Earthly Delights,” 12/12/1994
1995 (Geoffrey C. Ward, editor)
Harold Brodkey, “The Last Word on Winchell,” 1/30/1995
Ian Frazier, “Take the F,” 2/20/1995
Jamaica Kincaid, “Putting Myself Together,” 2/20/1995
Calvin Trillin, “State Secrets,” 5/29/1995
Nicholson Baker, “Books as Furniture,” 6/12/1995
Amitav Ghosh, “The Ghosts of Mrs. Gandhi,” 7/17/1995
William Styron, “A Case of the Great Pox,” 9/18/1995
Adam Gopnik, “Wonderland,” 10/9/1995
Chang-Rae Lee, “Coming Home Again,” 10/16/1995
Joyce Carol Oates, “They All Just Went Away,” 10/16/1995
Joan Acocella, “Cather and the Academy,” 11/27/1995
John Irving, “Slipped Away,” 12/11/1995
1996 (Ian Frazier, editor)
Roger Angell, “True Tales—Well, Maybe,” 1/22/1996
Harold Brodkey, “This Wild Darkness,” 2/5/1996
Paul Sheehan, “My Habit,” 2/12/1996
Jane Kramer, “The Invisible Woman,” 2/26/1996
Francine du Plessix Gray, “The Third Age,” 2/26/1996
Daphne Merkin, “Unlikely Obsession,” 2/26/1996
Marjorie Gross, “Cancer Becomes Me,” 4/15/1996
Jonathan Raban, “The Unlamented West,” 5/20/1996
Jo Ann Beard, “The Fourth State of Matter,” 6/24/1996
David Denby, “Buried Alive,” 7/15/1996
Kathryn Harrison, “Tick,” 7/29/1996
Calvin Trillin, “Anne of Red Hair,” 8/5/1996
Alison Rose, “Bathing-Suit Heroines,” 8/12/1996
Garry Wills, “John Wayne’s Body,” 8/19/1996
Vivian Gornick, “On the Street,” 9/9/1996
Richard Ford, “In the Face,” 9/16/1996
Cynthia Ozick, “A Drugstore Eden,” 9/16/1996
Hilton Als, “Notes on My Mother,” 11/18/1996
1997 (Cynthia Ozick, editor)
James Atlas, “Making the Grade,” 4/14/1997
Adam Gopnik, “Appointment with a Dinosaur,” 4/21/1997
John McPhee, “Silk Parachute,” 5/12/1997
Alison Rose, “Tales of a Beauty,” 5/26/1997
Oliver Sacks, “Water Babies,” 5/26/1997
Diana Trilling, “A Visit to Camelot,” 6/2/1997
Noelle Oxenhandler, “Fall from Grace,” 6/16/1997
David Denby, “In Darwin’s Wake,” 7/21/1997
Andre Dubus, “Witness,” 7/21/1997
Patrick McGrath, “Jealousy,” 8/25/1997
Cynthia Ozick, “Lovesickness,” 8/25/1997
Henry Louis Gates Jr., “The Naked Republic,” 8/25/1997
Salman Rushdie, “Crash,” 9/15/1997
John Updike, “Lost Art,” 12/15/1997
1998 (Edward Hoagland, editor)
Bill Buford, “Thy Neighbor’s Life,” 1/5/1998
Henry Louis Gates, Jr., “The End of Loyalty,” 3/8/1998
Arthur Miller, “Before Air-Conditioning,” 6/22/1998
John McPhee, “Swimming with Canoes,” 8/10/1998
Richard Ford, “Good Raymond,” 10/5/1998
Joan Didion, “Last Words,” 11/9/1998
John Lahr, “The Lion and Me,” 11/16/1998
Andre Aciman, “In Search of Proust,” 12/21/1998
George W.S. Trow, “Folding the Times,” 12/28/1998
1999 (Alan Lightman, editor)
Calvin Trillin, “The Chicken Vanishes,” 2/8/1999
Alec Wilkinson, “Notes Left Behind,” 2/15/1999
Hilton Als, “The Dope Show,” 2/22/1999
Cynthia Ozick, “The Synthetic Sublime,” 2/22/1999
Joseph Epstein, “Taking the Bypass,” 4/12/1999
Daphne Merkin, “Our Money, Ourselves,” 4/26/1999
Malcolm Gladwell, “The Physical Genius,” 8/2/1999
Bill Buford, “Lions and Tigers and Bears,” 8/23/1999
Henry Louis Gates Jr., “Rope Burn,” 8/23/1999
John Seabrook, “Nobrow Culture,” 9/20/1999
John McPhee, “Farewell to the Nineteenth Century,” 9/27/1999
Adam Gopnik, “The Rookie,” 10/4/1999
Dave Eggers, “The Orphans Are Coming!” 10/18/1999
John Updike, “The Future of Faith,” 11/29/1999
Oliver Sacks, “Brilliant Light,” 12/20/1999
2000 (Kathleen Norris, editor)
Dagoberto Gilb, “I Knew She Was Beautiful,” 3/13/2000
John McPhee, “They’re in the River,” 4/10/2000
Marcus Laffey, “The Midnight Tour,” 5/15/2000
Edward Hoagland, “Calliope Times,” 5/22/2000
Stephen King, “On Impact,” 6/19/2000
Tony Earley, “Granny’s Bridge,” 7/3/2000
Andre Aciman, “Arbitrage,” 7/10/2000
Mary Karr, “The Hot Dark,” 9/4/2000
Daphne Merkin, “Trouble in the Tribe,” 9/11/2000
2001 (Stephen Jay Gould, editor)
Daphne Merkin, “The Black Season,” 1/8/2001
Jamaica Kincaid, “Sowers and Reapers,” 1/22/2001
Darryl Pinckney, “Busted in New York,” 2/5/2001
Atul Gawande, “Final Cut,” 3/19/2001
Susan Sontag, “Where the Stress Falls,” 6/18/2001
Eric Konigsberg, “Blood Relation,” 8/6/2001
David Samuels, “The Runner,” 9/3/2001
Jonathan Franzen, “My Father’s Brain,” 9/10/2001
Adam Gopnik, “The City and the Pillars,” 9/24/2001
2002 (Anne Fadiman, editor)
Atul Gawande, “The Learning Curve,” 1/28/2002
Judith Thurman, “Swann Song,” 3/18/2002
Alice Munro, “Lying Under the Apple Tree,” 6/17/2002
Donald Antrim, “I Bought a Bed,” 6/17/2002
Katha Pollitt, “Learning to Drive,” 7/22/2002
Jane Kramer, “The Reporter’s Kitchen,” 8/19/2002
Cathleen Schine, “The ‘Holy Ground,'” 9/16/2002
Adam Gopnik, “Bumping Into Mr. Ravioli,” 9/30/2002
Oliver Sacks, “The Case of Anna H.,” 10/7/2002
Jerome Groopman, “Dying Words,” 10/28/2002
Gay Talese, “On the Bridge,” 12/2/2002
Ian Frazier, “Researchers Say,” 12/9/2002
2003 (Louis Menand, editor)
Scott Turow, “To Kill or Not To Kill,” 1/6/2003
Adam Gopnik, “The Unreal Thing,” 5/19/2003
Roger Angell, “Romance,” 5/26/2003
Susan Orlean, “Lifelike,” 6/9/2003
David Sedaris, “Our Perfect Summer,” 6/16/2003
Jonathan Franzen, “Caught,” 6/16/2003
Cynthia Ozick, “What Helen Keller Saw,” 6/16/2003
Laura Hillenbrand, “A Sudden Illness,” 7/7/2003
Alex Ross, “Rock 101,” 7/14/2003
Oliver Sacks, “The Mind’s Eye,” 7/28/2003
Cynthia Zarin, “An Enlarged Heart,” 8/18/2003
Don DeLillo, “That Day in Rome,” 10/20/2003
John McPhee, “1839/2003,” 12/15/2003
George Saunders, “Chicago Christmas, 1984,” 12/22/2003
2004 (Susan Orlean, editor)
Cathleen Schine, “Dog Trouble,” 1/5/2004
Katha Pollitt, “Webstalker,” 1/19/2004
Roger Angell, “La Vie en Rose,” 2/16/2004
Alex Ross, “Listen to This,” 2/16/2004
Donald Antrim, “The Kimono,” 3/15/2004
Adam Gopnik, “Last of the Metrozoids,” 5/10/2004
Simon Schama, “Sail Away,” 5/31/2004
Robert Stone, “The Prince of Possibility,” 6/14/2004
Joan Acocella, “Blocked,” 6/14/2004
Caitliin Flanagan, “To Hell With All That,” 7/5/2004
Oliver Sacks, “Speed,” 8/23/2004
Malcolm Gladwell, “The Ketchup Conundrum,” 9/6/2004
Calvin Trillin, “Dissed Fish,” 9/6/2004
Calvin Tomkins, “Summer Afternoon,” 9/13/2004
David Sedaris, “Old Faithful,” 11/29/2004
Jonathan Franzen, “The Comfort Zone,” 11/29/2004
2005 (Lauren Slater, editor)
Ian Frazier, “Out of Ohio,” 1/10/2005
Oscar Hijuelos, “Lunch at the Biltmore,” 1/17/2005
Roger Angell, “Andy,” 2/14/2005
Susan Orlean, “Lost Dog,” 2/14/2005
Jonathan Lethem, “The Beards,” 2/28/2005
Jonathan Franzen, “The Retreat,” 6/6/2005
Edmund White, “My Women,” 6/13/2005
Adam Gopnik, “Death of a Fish,” 7/4/2005
Oliver Sacks, “Recalled to Life,” 10/31/2005
2006 (David Foster Wallace, editor)
Calvin Trillin, “Alice, Off the Page,” 3/27/2006
Daniel Raeburn, “Vessels,” 5/1/2006
Malcolm Gladwell, “What the Dog Saw,” 5/22/2006
Louis Menand, “Name that Tone,” 6/26/2006
John Lahr, “Petrified,” 8/28/2006
Richard Preston, “Tall for Its Age,” 10/9/2006
Jill Lepore, “Noah’s Mark,” 11/6/2006
David Sedaris, “Road Trips,” 11/27/2006
Many, many thanks to Benjamin Chambers of The King’s English for fully nine of the years listed here. It made all the difference.

10.1.07 Issue: A Rush and a Push

In which the staff of Emdashes reviews the high points and discusses the particulars of the previous week’s issue (or, occasionally, another edition).
Jean-Claude Floc’h is a discovery I attribute to The Complete New Yorker, so it was a treat to see his drawing of an old-timey golfer on page 24. My admiration for Floc’h suggests that I am bigger fan of the ligne claire style than I even realize.
I enjoyed Nick Paumgarten’s excellent look at the Mannahatta Project, which answers all of the questions a reader could expect to have at the outset, and then some. Loved his description of New Yorkers as having “a kind of a superheated parochial self-regard.” I applaud Paumgarten’s desire and ability to come up with outsize formulations; it made the article more of a magnificent flower.
“The Insufferable Gaucho” is Roberto Bolaño’s cunning satire on the mythos that has developed around the pampas. The story feels like the Chilean author’s private joke on neighboring (rabbit-infested?) Argentina—the two countries, it is said, do not get along. I was so taken by Christian Northeast‘s striking illustration for the story that I tore that page out of the magazine and hung it on an unoccupied nail on the wall of my spare Alpine cabin. —Martin Schneider

Yes, The New Yorker Has Online-Only Content

I noticed that in the course of praising this James Surowiecki online-only article on the delusions of the supply-side gang (it really is splendid), Matthew Yglesias expressed some puzzlement that The New Yorker offers online-only content. For shame, Matt!
So in the interests of full disclosure, I thought I’d provide a little tour of The New Yorker‘s website and highlight a few recent additions.
First of all, videos from the New Yorker Festival are up! The robust offerings include Seymour M. Hersh, Judd Apatow and Seth Rogen, Steve Martin, and Sigur Rós. If you were hindered, geographically or otherwise, from attending the Festival, this is the next best option.
You all know that after an abortive attempt or two, The New Yorker is now successfully pursuing the blog thing, right? New Yorker regulars Sasha Frere-Jones, George Packer, Dana Goodyear, and Hendrik Hertzberg have diligently been updating. The blogs do lack comments and have not quite attained Kevin Drum status yet—but give them time. It’s still a treat to see Hertzberg and Frere-Jones make minor updates to recent articles and Goodyear report on the surfers’ perspective on the SoCal fires.
Users of iTunes may already be aware that New Yorker podcasts are available. Even if you don’t use that program, you can get the mp3 files directly from the site. The latest entry is newcomer Ryan Lizza expanding on his article on Mitt Romney.
Somewhat reminiscent of newspaper websites are the intriguing pictorial slideshows: two recent ones supplement Bill Buford’s article about chocolate and Nick Paumgarten’s article on the Mannahatta Project.
Also, last but not least, remember that a version of the Goings on About Town are also on the website. —Martin Schneider

9.24.07 Issue: Too Sexy for My Shoe

In which the staff of Emdashes reviews the high points and discusses the particulars of the previous week’s issue (or, occasionally, another edition).
Did anybody else notice the astronomical Proust quotient in this year’s Style Issue? (Why the Style Issue for so much Proust, anyway?) I sure as hell noticed the ribald Proust reference in Francine du Plessix Gray’s Onward and Upward about Marie-Laure de Noailles, boy howdy! (For the record, ladies, I’ve never read Proust.)
Henry Alford’s Annal of Technology about the solar-powered jacket amused me very much. I do confess to being puzzled (nay, alarmed) by his unabashed use of the veddy British word “whinging,” though.
Finally, I hereby nominate Nancy Franklin for Parenthetical of the Year. Here it is, from her fine negative review of Ken Burns’s PBS documentary The War: “(There will also be, in some places, no swearing; local stations worried about F.C.C. fines for offensive language are being offered a version of the series which removes the four instances of tangy language that unaccountably made their way into a documentary about what it’s like to kill, to see your friends be killed, and to spend endless days and nights in unrelieved fear of being killed yourself.)” Thank you for that. —Martin Schneider

Face in the Crowd

Two months ago, I alerted readers to the amusing fact that both Martha Stewart and Vince Foster managed to garner mention in The New Yorker a great many years before they achieved broader fame.
I’ve found another one.
Bobby Fischer became one of the most breathlessly discussed people in the world in 1972, when he beat Boris Spassky in Reykjavik, Iceland, to win the World Chess Championship in what someone recently called “a Cold War epic (of a particularly neurotic type).”
But if you want to know what people thought of him fifteen years before that, The New Yorker has the goods.
In the September 7, 1957, issue there appears a lengthy TOTT by Bernard Taper about the precocious titleholder of the U.S. Open Chess Championship, which a few weeks earlier Fischer had become the youngest person to secure. Titled simply “Prodigy,” Taper’s piece is very good, delving into Fischer’s mediocre academic record at Erasmus Hall High School and introducing readers to the extreme contrast between conventional chess and speed chess (here called “blitz”).
It’s a little like coming across an ancient copy of Sports Illustrated at an antiques store and finding someone like Terry Bradshaw in that great “Faces in the Crowd” feature.
Which reminds me. Sports Illustrated actually beat The New Yorker to the punch on Fischer, who was listed as a “Face in the Crowd” in 1956. —Martin Schneider

Call for Submissions: The Leonard Lopate Show Cartoon Contest

We’re pleased to bring the jocular doodlers among you news of a rare opportunity: Now that cartoon caption contests are all the rage, why not a contest for the cartoons themselves?
WNYC public radio host Leonard Lopate and New Yorker cartoon editor Robert Mankoff had the same thought, and are joining forces to host just such a competition. Naturally, they thought of the readership of Emdashes as a promising source of entrants.
Here are the details: Whip up a cartoon on the subject of Thanksgiving, give it a caption, get it into .jpg or .gif format, and post it to this Flickr group before 12 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2007. Mankoff will then choose his favorites and discuss them on The Leonard Lopate Show one week later, the day before Thanksgiving, November 21, 2007. (Don’t forget that Thanksgiving is on its earliest possible day this year.)
So bust out your pens, brushes, electronic tablets, crayons, lipsticks, woodcutting equipment, what have you, and do us proud! If the resultant radio segment consists of nothing but Emdashes readers, that’s just fine with us. —Martin Schneider

Covers in the News, and on the Web

The New Yorker‘s September 11, 2006, cover is a finalist for ASME’s 2007 Best Cover Contest. The two-part cover—published on the five-year anniversary of the attacks of September 11—was illustrated by Owen Smith, from a concept by John Mavroudis, and it’s also a winning entry in PRINT‘s brand-new Regional Design Annual (on newsstands any minute now). Buy the issue; it’s also got a piece I wrote about The New Republic‘s recent redesign and What It Means, plus hundreds of beautiful pages of other Regional winners and, of course, many excellent articles you’ll like.
Speaking of my home magazine, we’ve got a Student Cover Competition going on, so go over there and vote! Forty-three years after the magazine’s first such competition, we’ve made it interactive. A swarm of students from around the world designed fantasy PRINT covers, and we’ve got the work of all three finalists on our website: Brandon Maddox, from Valencia Community College, Orlando, Florida; Katty Maurey, from L’Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Canada; and Blaz Porenta, from the University of Ljubljana, Academy of Fine Arts and Design, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
You choose the winner, to be featured in our April 2008 issue; the polls close November 16. Participate in design democracy!

9.03.07 & 9.10.07 Issue: A Cornucopia, a Smorgasbord, and Similar Metaphors

In which various Emdashes contributors note what we liked in a recent issue of the magazine—usually that of the previous week, but, as you will see, not always.
Some weeks ago, when Emily and I were still roughly on POTI (what we call “Pick of the Issue”; it’s like POTUS, but without veto power) schedule, The Millions likened The New Yorker‘s annual food issue to Sports Illustrated‘s swimsuit issue. This take on the subject has never occurred to me, but it’s pretty charming. Do any of you feel that way?
Having now tamped expectations, I will say this year’s food issue was a good one. It arrived right on the heels of William Shawn’s hundredth birthday, for which I used the occasion to wax appreciative about him. Naturally, then, I was tickled to see an extensive article, dedicated to William Shawn, by John McPhee (a writer I must read more of) about the strange animals that McPhee and others have eaten. It didn’t, in the end, have much to do with Shawn, but that didn’t prevent the piece from containing quite a few eyebrow-raisers, which is inevitable when you explain the process of fricaseeing mountain oysters. (Clearly, this genre writes itself.)
I loved Patrick Radden Keefe’s Reporter at Large about flamboyant and improbably named apparent oeno-charlatan Hardy Rodenstock. Excavating an imbroglio heretofore limited to a self-regarding coterie is the kind of thing The New Yorker does best. Jane Kramer’s look at Claudia Roden, the esteemed British writer on Middle Eastern cuisine, seemed a bit cramped in places, but by the time the dust settled, I was glad I read it.
Now I’m hungry; off to plumb the fridge. —Martin Schneider

Guest Post Friday: A Skeptical View of Animated Cartoons

Our friend Jeff Simmermon, fearless globe-trotting reporter, weighs in on those animated versions of New Yorker cartoons that you know and love (and some that you’ve never seen before). Read on.
The New Yorker‘s website has merged its paper cartoons with web animation into a series of ten-second creations that deliver neither the punch of a static cartoon nor the fun of a quick web video.
Ten seconds is eight or nine seconds too long. Single-panel comics are haiku jammed halfway through a looking glass; the process of getting them is nearly immediate, but requires your perception of the situation to flip over halfway. It’s safe to say that New Yorker subscribers are some of the world’s most practiced readers, and safe to assume that it takes those readers two seconds, tops, to read a New Yorker cartoon.
This is a good amount of time to invest in a cartoon. If it’s not funny, it’s quickly forgotten. And if it’s hilarious, the rapid intake makes the cartoon hit harder. The New Yorker’s cartoons are rarely hilarious; they’re not meant to be knee-slapping guffaw-makers—it’s just not their style. Rather, they’re dry and sly, a subtle inversion of ordinary life that makes the lips curl upward a bit. I often think “Wow, that’s funny,” but rarely do I show it. Drumming up expectations for the cartoon and stretching it out five times as long in video form deflates the fun.
Here’s a breakdown of a recent release, an animation of a 1999 Harry Bliss cartoon:
The intro music—usually a few jazzy notes on the bass while a cute cat pulls a sign bearing the “RingTails Presents/A New Yorker Cartoon” logo across the screen—says “Get ready, folks, you’re gonna laugh at something cute and wacky!” We’ll just see about that.
The “camera” pulls back to reveal a doctor holding a needle. As soon as the nervous little boy is in the frame, we’ve got the whole story. Because doctors are supposed to say something reassuring—and we know we’re watching a cartoon—the first law of comedy is to do the exact opposite of what the audience expects from a normal situation. So of course the doctor says “This is going to hurt like hell.” The little boy’s weeping underscores the point too heavily. It’s the cartoon itself saying “See what I did there?” The whole enterprise would have been a little more interesting if the doctor had said “Relax. You’ll just feel a little pinch and then our benevolent alien overlords will welcome you into the comforts of their heavenly bosom.”
Comics are notoriously difficult to translate into moving pictures, and getting a familiar cartoonist’s style right in motion can be tough. Gahan Wilson’s loopy, maniacal style, for instance, translates visually but suffers in translation. Nevertheless, apparently there are folks who like these little hybrids. Editrix Emily Gordon herself told me over coffee, “You know, those video cartoons are really popular.” I’m sure they are, and so are Big Macs and American Idol—quick, cheesy, and overdone.
—Jeff Simmermon